ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The WHO has identified HCV infection as a public health threat and set a global target for HCV elimination by 2030, yet currently only 11 countries are on track to achieve HCV elimination targets. Up to 60% of HCV + patients are lost to follow-up and remain untreated and this has likely been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have reduced HCV treatment urgency, causing many patients to delay care. To achieve the WHO goal, still many patients need to be screened and linked to care. Gilead has been running Local Elimination Programs Leading to Global Action in HCV (LEGA-C) to support implementation science projects toward HCV elimination. Here, we explore the outcomes of LEGA-C programs for patients with HCV especially in Asia. Method(s): The outcomes and impact were measured through the number of studies and patients to be reached;steps in the care cascade as well as efficacy of each model were assessed along with the presentations and publications from each study. Result(s): In total,[120 studies were supported. Of these, 18 have completed or are ongoing in Asia. Through July 2022, 175,192 persons were screened, 6,287 were HCV + and enrolled in a study, and 3,768 received treatment. A simplified screening and linkage to care/ minimal monitoring model was investigated in 8 studies and demonstrated that linkage to care with minimal monitoring could achieve antiviral response comparable to standard practice.[i] Four test-and-treat studies showed that aggressive screening and on-site treatment promotes HCV microelimination.[ii] Three outreach-andcallback studies showed demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting persons to HCV screening programs in community settings.[iii] Seven studies focused on special populations, and 4 of them described the characteristics of special populations with higher rates of HCV infection. Publications from these studies in Asia include 14 full articles, and these papers were cited a total of 56 times. Conclusion(s): The ongoing LEGA-C initiative is demonstrably contributing to the understanding, treatment, and ultimate elimination of HCV. Innovative ideas, active promotion of HCV testing, disease education, patient navigation, and care coordination in these programs led to increased screening and rates of linkage to care. Adopting and adapting effective strategies from these programs may be a feasible way to increase treatment numbers and improve patient outcomes, thus contributing to meeting the WHO goal of HCV elimination in Asia.
ABSTRACT
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated promising serologic responses in PLWH receiving a third dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. However, real-world clinical effectiveness, especially during the pandemic caused by B.1.1.529 variant, remains less investigated. Method(s): PLWH seeking HIV care at our hospital from 2021/6 to 2022/6 were included and advised to receive the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals were excluded from this study if they had been previously diagnosed with COVID-19. Different types of COVID-19 vaccines were available in the vaccination program, including BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 (either 50 or 100 mug), MVC-COV1901 and NVX-CoV2373 vaccines. PLWH were screening for the occurrence of COVID-19 through the reporting system of notifiable diseases of Taiwan CDC, and were tested for anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) IgG every 1 to 3 months. Participants were followed for 180 days until the fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccination, occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroconversion of anti-N IgG, death, or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first. Result(s): 1,496 PLWH were included: 631 (42.2%) receiving 100 mug mRNA-1273 vaccine, 468 (31.3%) 50 mug mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 328 (21.9%) BNT162b2 vaccine, 65 (4.3%) MVC-COV1901 vaccine, and 4 (0.3%) NVX-CoV2373 vaccine for the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. 297 (19.9%) PLWH were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the follow-up period, including 92 (14.6%) who received 100 mug mRNA-1273, 111 (23.7%) 50 mug mRNA-1273, 79 (24.1%) BNT162b2 and 15 (21.7%) either MVC-COV1901 or NVX-CoV2373;in addition, 98 PLWH had seroconversion of anti-N IgG during follow-up, including 23, 50, 19 and 6 PLWH who received 100 mug mRNA-1273, 50 mug mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and either MVC-COV1901 or NVX-CoV2373, respectively. Similar rates of new infection with SARS-CoV-2 or seroconversion of anti-N IgG were demonstrated regardless the vaccine type of the third dose (log-rank test, p=0.46). Factors associated with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and seroconversion of anti-N IgG included an age >50 years (aOR, 0.67;95% CI, 0.49-0.91) and newly infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (aOR, 1.41;95% CI, 1.09-1.83). Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrated that clinical effectiveness of the third dose of different vaccines available to PLWH was similar in preventing SARSCoV- 2 infection or seroconversion of anti-N IgG Taiwan. PLWH aged less than 50 years and those with newly diagnosed HCV infection were at higher risk of acquiring COVID-19. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for acquiring COVID-19 or seroconversion of anti-N IgG in PLWH receiving different COVID-19 vaccination of the third dose (log-rank test, 4 groups, p = 0.46).
ABSTRACT
Background: Previous studies had demonstrated that patients with hematologic malignancies had suboptimal antibody response after receiving COVID-19 vaccines, especially among those having previously treated with anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Method(s): Adult patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were enrolled before receiving the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Determinations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid IgG titers were performed every 1-3 months, after they received the second and the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, respectively. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were diagnosed with COVID-19. All serum samples were tested for anti-nucleocapsid antibody and those tested positive were excluded from subsequent analyses. Result(s): A total of 85 participants were enrolled, including 42 (49.4%) with diffused large B-cell lymphoma, and 13 (15.3) with follicular lymphoma and 9 with CLL. 72 (84.7%) participants had received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, with a median interval of 24 months between last anti-CD20 treatment and the second dose of vaccine, and 21 (24.7%) had HIV infection. Factors associated with failure to achieve an anti-spike IgG titer >141 BAU/ mL within 12 weeks after the second dose of vaccine included HIV infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.14;95% CI, 0.04-0.51), active hematologic disease (aOR, 5.50;95% CI 1.42-21.32), receipt of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (aOR, 6.65;95% CI 1.52-29.07), and receipt of two doses of homologous mRNA vaccination (aOR, 0.17;95% CI 0.05-0.56). In the participants having previously treated with anti-CD20 regimen, only 8.6% achieved an antibody response ( >141 BAU/mL) in the first year, while 78.3% achieved anti-spike IgG titer > 141 BAU/mL after two years post B-cell depleting treatment. After the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 53.6% achieved an antispike IgG titer > 141 BAU/mL in the first year post anti-CD20 treatment. Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrated that previous treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies was associated a lower antibody response among patients with lymphoproliferative disorders receiving two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. While two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines might not be sufficient even one year apart from the last dose of rituximab, a third dose of vaccine may boost anti-spike IgG particularly in the subset of recent exposure to rituximab. Anti-spike IgG determined 1-3 months after the second (A) / third (B) dose of COVID-19 vaccine, stratified by the interval between last anti-CD20 regimen and the second / third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: To contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, non-pharmacologic interventions, including lockdown and social distancing, may have adverse impact on access to HIV testing and care. This study investigated the impact of Covid-19 on HIV testing and care at a major hospital in Taiwan in 2020-2021. Method(s): The numbers of clients seeking anonymous HIV voluntary counseling and testing were compared 2 years before (2018-2019) and 2 years after Covid-19 outbreak (2020-2021). People living with HIV (PLWH) who sought care at the hospital during 2018-2021 were included to examine the status of HIV care delivery and disposition. Result(s): The annual number of HIV screening tests performed had significantly decreased from 2507 to 2794 in 2018 and 2019, respectively, to 2161 and 1737 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The rate of discontinuation of HIV care among PLWH was 3.7% in 2019, which remained unchanged in 2020 (3.7%) and 2021 (3.8%). The respective percentage of annual plasma HIV RNA testing <2 times increased from 8.4% to 7.8% in 2018 and 2019 to 7.0% and 10.7% in 2020 and 2021, so was that of annual syphilis testing <2 times (10.1% and 8.8%-7.9% and 12.0%). The rates of plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/ml ranged from 97.0% to 98.1% in 2018-2021. Conclusion(s): During the Covid-19 pandemic, access to HIV counseling and testing was significantly limited. While the number of HIV-related testing decreased, the impact of Covid-19 on the continuity of antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression among PLWH appeared to be minimal in Taiwan. Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: A large-scale community COVID-19 outbreak occurred between April and August 2021 in Taiwan, where non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been strictly implemented and COVID-19 vaccination program was not implemented until 1 March, 2021. Although COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for at-risk populations, the vaccine effectiveness in people living with HIV (PLWH) remains incompletely understood. We evaluated the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination among PLWH during a COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan. Methods: From 1 March to 30 September, 2021, all adult PLWH without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were included and advised to receive 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The government-funded vaccination campaign provided different types of COVID-19 vaccine, including ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and MVC-COV1901 (Medigen) vaccines. The primary endpoint of this study was the vaccine effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 among PLWH, which was estimated by comparing incidence rates between the unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, and fully vaccinated groups in a dynamic cohort. Results: During the study period, 3131 PLWH were included, with 99.9% on antiretroviral therapy, 99.8% being MSM and median CD4 count of 627 cells/mm3. In the dynamic cohort, 3128 PLWH contributed 516892 person-days of follow-up (PDFU) to the unvaccinated group, 2476 PLWH contributed 139163 PDFU to the partially vaccinated group, and 236 PLWH contributed 12011 PDFU to the fully vaccinated group (Table). During the follow-up, 37 PLWH (1.2%) acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections. The incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6.4 per 100,000 PDFU in the unvaccinated group, which decreased to 2.9 and 0 per 100,000 PDFU in the partially and fully vaccinated groups, respectively. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 0.47 (95% CI, 0.17-1.32) in the partially vaccinated group and <0.01 in the fully vaccinated group compared with the unvaccinated group, resulting in vaccine effectiveness rates of 53.4% and 99.9% for single-and 2-dose COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination was clinically effective among PLWH during the outbreak setting where NPIs were strictly implemented.